[Over] the last decade there has emerged a growing explicit (theoretically formulated) or tacit (pragmatic) acceptance by Anglophone academics working in the field that fascism’s ineliminable core is made up of the vision of a regenerated political culture and national community brought about in a post-liberal age. Inevitably, such a consensus can never be total and there are academics working in fascist studies who continue to apply a different ideal type of fascism, some of whom express deep scepticism about the very existence of an area of convergence on the centrality to fascism of an ultra-nationalist myth of rebirth. The most cited version of the consensus applied by academics who are sympathetic to it is the highly synthetic formula that I used to encapsulate my own ideal type: ‘Fascism is a political ideology whose mythic core in its various permutations is a palingenetic form of populist ultra-nationalism … The totalitarian movements represented by the PNF and the NSDAP and the totalitarian regimes that they underpinned became the role model for all revolutionary nationalists in the inter-war period and synonymous with totalitarian, mass-based revolutionary nationalism itself. This became known as ‘fascism’ after the first such movement to achieve power, namely Mussolini’s fascismo. However, it was only in Italy and Germany that the structural crisis of liberal society was profound enough to generate a genuinely charismatic form of populist politics, one which was not confined to the hard core of movement activists, but involved the particular type of consensus generated by a ‘palingenetic political community’, thereby creating the basis for a fascist regime. (Aus dem Beitrag von Roger Griffin)
Gunter Dehnert
Prof. Dr. Leonid Luks, geb. 1947 in Sverdlovsk (heute Ekaterinburg). Studierte Slavische Philologie, Osteuropäische Geschichte und Neuere Geschichte in Jerusalem und München. 1973 Promotion und 1981 Habilitation an der LMU München. Danach als Hochschullehrer tätig an den Universitäten München, Bremen und Köln. 1995-2012 Inhaber des Lehrstuhls für Mittel- und Osteuropäische Zeitgeschichte an der Katholischen Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt. Seit 2011 Direktor des Zentralinstituts für Mittel- und Osteuropastudien (ZIMOS) an der KU Eichstätt-Ingolstadt. Geschäftsführender Herausgeber der Zeitschrift „Forum für osteuropäische Ideen- und Zeitgeschichte“.
Nikolaus Lobkowicz
Leonid Luks
Prof. Dr. Leonid Luks, geb. 1947 in Sverdlovsk (heute Ekaterinburg), studierte Slavische Philologie, Osteuropäische Geschichte und Neuere Geschichte in Jerusalem und in München. 1973 Promotion, 1981 Habilitation an der LMU München. Danach als Hochschullehrer an den Universitäten München, Bremen und Köln tätig. 1995–2012 Inhaber des Lehrstuhls für Mittel- und Osteuropäische Zeitgeschichte an der Katholischen Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt. 2011–2015 Direktor des Zentralinstituts für Mittel- und Osteuropastudien an der KU Eichstätt-Ingolstadt. Geschäftsführender Herausgeber der Zeitschriften Forum für osteuropäische Ideen- und Zeitgeschichte und Форум новейшей восточноевропейской истории и культуры. Autor zahlreicher Fachbücher und Aufsätze.
Alexei Rybakow
Martina Tsoi
Andreas Umland
Andreas Umland, M.Phil. (Oxford), Dr.Phil. (FU Berlin), Ph.D. (Cambridge), Research Fellow at the Swedish Institute of International Affairs in Stockholm, Senior Expert at the Ukrainian Institute for the Future in Kyiv, and Associate Professor at the National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy.
ORCID: 0000000179164646
|
Delivery time
|
Delivery time 2-3 working days.
|
| Edited by | Gunter Dehnert, Nikolaus Lobkowicz, Leonid Luks, Alexei Rybakow, Martina Tsoi, Andreas Umland |
|---|
| Contributions by | Roger Griffin, Hubert Kiesewetter, Sebastian Prinz |
|---|
|
Number of Pages |
136
|
|
Publication date |
03.07.2023
|
|
Format |
210,0 mm x 148,0 mm
|
|
Language |
German
|
|
Series |
Forum für osteuropäische Ideen- und Zeitgeschichte
|
|
Type |
Paperback
|
|
ISBN
|
978-3-8382-1867-0
|
|
Weight
|
180 g
|
.jpg)